• Home
  • Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
      Editorial Board
      Indexing
      Sources of Financing
      Ethics & Policies
      Publication Ethics Conflict of Interest Open Access Policy Archiving Complaints Policy Privacy Statement Corrections and Retractions Academic Integrity Generative AI Policy
      For Authors
      Terms of Publication Formatting Guidelines Peer Review Process Article Processing Charges License Agreement
  • Submission
  • Contacts
en
  • Українська

Ukrainian Black Sea Region Agrarian Science

  • Submit an article
  • Home
  • Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Open Access Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Academic Integrity Generative AI Policy
  • Contacts

Article

  • Read article
  • Download article

Received 19.12.2025

Revised 23.04.2026

Accepted 26.05.2026

Published 30.06.2026

Retrieved from Volume 30, No. 2, 2026

Pages 49 -59

  • 16 Views

Suggested citation

Luhovyi, S., Povoznikov, M., Kalynycnenko, H., Onyshchenko, L., & Moisei, I. (2026). The effect of adding a dietary fibre feed supplement on sow welfare, reproductive performance, and farrowing economic indicators. Ukrainian Black Sea Region Agrarian Science, 30(2), 49-59. https://doi.org/10.56407/bs.agrarian/2.2026.49

The effect of adding a dietary fibre feed supplement on sow welfare, reproductive performance, and farrowing economic indicators

Serhii Luhovyi Mykola Povoznikov Halyna Kalynycnenko Liudmyla Onyshchenko Ihor Moisei

Abstract

The purpose of the research was to study the effect of including 1.0% of the feed fibre supplement in the diets of pregnant and lactating sows on the course of farrowing, reproductive performance, growth intensity and survival of piglets, as well as the economic efficiency of production. The study was conducted under the conditions of an industrial pig complex on two groups of sows formed according to the principle of analogues. The control group received standard compound feed according to physiological condition, while the sows of the experimental group additionally received the fibre supplement JELUVET® at a dose of 10 kg/t of compound feed. Feed conversion was recalculated per one weaned piglet and per 1 kg of piglet weight gain. It was established that the use of fibre reduced the proportion of farrowings with complications by 2.83% and decreased expenditures on preventive and therapeutic measures by 72.16 UAH per sow (34.4%). Number born alive piglets in the experimental group increased by 0.58 (4.1%), and the total number of piglets born per farrowing exceeded the control by 0.51 (3.4%). The average weight of stillborn piglets decreased by 1.07 percentage points, while the litter weight of piglets at birth increased by 1.06 kg (5.7%) and at weaning by 2.92 kg (3.5%), without a negative effect on individual piglet weight gains. The use of the supplement did not increase total feed consumption; however, it reduced feed expenditure per 1 kg of piglet weight gain by 0.21 kg (3.3%) and per one weaned piglet by 1.71 kg (4.2%). Economic evaluation showed that the additional profit per sow amounted to 622.07 UAH, which confirmed the economic feasibility of using the fibre supplement. The obtained results indicated that the inclusion of 1.0% fibre supplement in the diet of pregnant and lactating sows improved the course of farrowing, increased prolificacy and the total productivity of piglet litters, promoted efficient feed utilisation, and ensured a significant economic effect

Keywords:

piglets; pregnancy; lactation; dietary fibre; economic efficiency

References

  1. Adi, Y.K., Boonprakob, R., Kirkwood, R.N., & Tummaruk, P. (2022). Factors associated with farrowing duration in hyperprolific sows in a free farrowing system under tropical conditions. Animals, 12(21), article number 2943. doi: 10.3390/ani12212943.
  2. Boonprakob, R., Vimolmangkang, S., & Tummaruk, P. (2024). Impacts of supplementing Cannabis sativa byproducts during the transition period on behaviour, feed consumption, constipation levels, colostrum production and piglet performance in hyperprolific sows. Theriogenology, 215, 272-280. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2023.12.010.
  3. Cong, G., Liu, C., Xia, S., Li, J., & Hung, I. (2025). Dietary fibre supplementation in late gestation modulates gut microbiota and improves reproductive performance and colostrum quality in sows. Frontiers in Microbiology, 16, article number 1667697. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1667697.
  4. Council Directive 98/58/EC “Concerning the Protection of Animals Kept for Farming Purposes”. (1998, July). Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/1998/58/oj.
  5. Feyera, T., Hu, L., Eskildsen, M., Bruun, T.S., & Theil, P.K. (2021). Impact of four fiber-rich supplements on nutrient digestibility, colostrum production, and farrowing performance in sows. Journal of Animal Science, 99(9), article number skab247. doi: 10.1093/jas/skab247.
  6. Grahofer, A., & Plush, K. (2023). Lactation in swine: Review article. Animal Frontiers, 13(3), 112-118. doi: 10.1093/af/vfad020.
  7. Hu, J., Kim, Y.H., & Kim, I.H. (2021). Effects of two bacillus strains probiotic supplement on reproduction performance, nutrient digestibility, blood profile, fecal score, excreta odor contents and fecal microflora in lactation sows, and growth performance in sucking piglets. Livestock Science, 244, article number 104293. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2020.104293.
  8. Jha, R., Fouhse, J.M., Tiwari, U.P., Li, L., & Willing, B.P. (2019). Dietary fiber and intestinal health of monogastric animals. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 6, article number 48. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00048.
  9. Ji, Y. (2025). Effect of dietary neutral detergent fiber intake on reproductive performance and related physiological parameters of gestating sows. Animals, 15(23), article number 3455. doi: 10.3390/ani15233455.
  10. Jo, H., & Kim, B.G. (2023). Effects of dietary fiber in gestating sow diets – a review. Animal Bioscience, 36(11), 1619-1631. doi: 10.5713/ab.23.0206.
  11. Khmelnychyi, L.M., Povod, V.V., & Bordunova, O.H. (2023). Technology of production and processing of livestock products. Odesa: Oldi+.
  12. Kramarenko, S.S., Luhovyi, S.I., Lykhach, A.V., & Kramarenko, O.S. (2019). Analysis of biometric data in animal breeding and selection. Mykolaiv: Mykolaiv National Agrarian University.
  13. Li, Y., et al. (2021). Effects of dietary fiber supplementation in gestation diets on sow performance, physiology and milk composition for successive three parities. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 276, article number 114945. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2021.114945.
  14. Liu, B., et al. (2021). Consumption of dietary fiber from different sources during pregnancy alters sow gut microbiota and improves performance and reduces inflammation in sows and piglets. mSystems, 6(1). doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00591-20.
  15. Liu, X., Wei, X., Feng, Y., Liu, H., Tang, J., Gao, F., & Shi, B. (2024). Supplementation with complex dietary fiber during late pregnancy and lactation can improve progeny growth performance by regulating maternal antioxidant status and milk quality. Antioxidants, 13(1), article number 22. doi: 10.3390/antiox13010022.
  16. Liu, Y., et al. (2022). The improvement of parturition duration by high intake of dietary fibre in late gestation is associated with gut microbiota and metabolome in sows. British Journal of Nutrition, 128(12), 2341-2352. doi: 10.1017/S0007114522000502.
  17. Lu, D., et al. (2022). Consumption of dietary fiber with different physicochemical properties during late pregnancy alters the gut microbiota and relieves constipation in sow model. Nutrients, 14(12), article number 2511. doi: 10.3390/nu14122511.
  18. Montoya, C.A., Rohleff, I., Hodgkinson, S., Stoklosinski, H.M., & Moughan, P.J. (2023). Type and amount of dietary fiber influence the hindgut synthesis of organic acids from fermentable material of both total and nondietary origin in a pig model of the adult human. The Journal of Nutrition, 153(10), 2868-2877. doi: 10.1016/j.tjnut.2023.08.017.
  19. Moturi, J., Hosseindoust, A., Tajudeen, H., Mun, J.Y., Ha, S.H., & Kim, J.S. (2022). Influence of dietary fiber intake and soluble to insoluble fiber ratio on reproductive performance of sows during late gestation under hot climatic conditions. Scientific Reports, 12, article number 19749. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-23811-8.
  20. Oh, S.M., Hosseindoust, A., Ha, S.H., Mun, J.Y., Moturi, J., Tajudeen, H., Choi, Y.H., Lee, S.H., & Kim, J.S. (2024). Importance of dietary supplementation of soluble and insoluble fibers to sows subjected to high ambient temperatures during late gestation and effects on lactation performance. Animal Nutrition, 16, 73-83. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2023.10.004.
  21. Pedersen, T.F., Van Vliet, S., Bruun, T.S., & Theil, P.K. (2020). Feeding sows during the transition period – is a gestation diet, a simple transition diet, or a lactation diet the best choice? Translational Animal Science, 4(1), 34-48. doi: 10.1093/tas/txz155.
  22. Rinninella, E., Raoul, P., Cintoni, M., Franceschi, F., Miggiano, G.A.D., Gasbarrini, A., & Mele, M.C. (2019). What is the healthy gut microbiota composition? A changing ecosystem across age, environment, diet, and diseases. Microorganisms, 7(1), article number 14. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms7010014.
  23. Rosero, D.S. (2024). Feeding the modern sow: Unlocking the value of dietary fiber. Journal of Animal Science, 102(2), article number 188. doi: 10.1093/jas/skae102.210.
  24. Zhou, P., Wu, Y., Shen, J., Duan, T., Che, L., Zhang, Y., Zhao, Y., & Yan, H. (2025). Gestational inulin supplementation in low-/high-fat sow diets: Effects on growth performance, lipid metabolism, and meat quality of offspring pigs. Foods, 14(8), article number 1314. doi: 10.3390/foods14081314.
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email
Telegram
Viber
WhatsApp

Address
54020, Ukraine, Mykolaiv,
9 Georgiy Gongadze Str.


Email
ubsras@bsagriculture.com.ua

Main information
  • Aims and Scope
  • Indexing
  • Terms of Publication
  • Editorial Board
  • Publication Ethics
Additional information
  • Complaints Policy
  • Peer Review Process
  • Open Access Policy
  • Academic Integrity Generative AI Policy
  • Archiving