Article

Received 08.09.2025

Revised 30.01.2026

Accepted 31.03.2026

Published 13.04.2026

Retrieved from Vol. 30, No. 1, 2026

Pages 64 -78

Nehoda, Yu., Labenko, O., & Zharikova, О. (2026). Financial instruments for promoting resource conservation in the agricultural sector. Ukrainian Black Sea Region Agrarian Science, 30(1), 64-78. https://doi.org/10.56407/bs.agrarian/1.2026.64

Financial instruments for promoting resource conservation in the agricultural sector

Yuliia Nehoda Oleksandr Labenko Оlena Zharikova

The transformation of the agricultural sector towards sustainable development requires effective financial mechanisms to implement environmentally oriented technologies and management practices. The study aimed to analyse the efficiency and specific features of applying modern financial instruments to promote resource-saving practices in the agricultural sector and to develop recommendations for their optimal use. The methodology combined quantitative and qualitative analytical methods, using systemic, comparative, and statistical analysis of 4 efficiency indicators for financial instruments across 10 countries worldwide for the period 2020-2024. An Efficiency Composite Index (ECI) was developed based on five key components of resource efficiency using descriptive statistics, correlation, and multiple regression analysis. The study revealed that green loans (34.2% of total funding) and government subsidies (28.7%) were the dominant sources among eight types of financial instruments. Green loans demonstrated the highest efficiency in increasing resource efficiency (82.7 points) and the strongest correlation with reduced water consumption (r = 0.89), as shown by the example of the Danish company Arla Foods, which, after securing a €750 million green loan, reduced its water consumption by 23% and energy by 18%.Government subsidies proved most effective in improving environmental performance (79.8 points), as confirmed by the experience of the German organic farming support programme. Cluster analysis identified three groups of countries: “Innovation Leaders” with an average ECI of 86.7 points (Denmark, the Netherlands), “Stable Performers” with an ECI of 76.4 points (Germany, France, the USA, Canada), and “Developing Countries” with an ECI of 62.8 points (China, India, Ukraine, Poland). A significant synergistic effect was identified from the combined use of government subsidies and private investment (synergy coefficient of 1.34) and the universality of microfinance with the lowest variability between countries (12.7 points difference). Multiple regression analysis confirmed a statistically significant model (R2 = 0.78), where the greatest impact on efficiency is exerted by the volume of green financing (β = 0.34) and the share of subsidies in Gross Domestic Product (β = 0.28). The practical significance of the study lies in the potential to apply the developed index to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of national financial support programmes for resource efficiency

green lending; environmental finance; resource efficiency; subsidy support; efficiency composite index; synergistic effects
  1. Abduh, M. (2019). The role of Islamic social finance in achieving SDG number 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture. Al-Shajarah: Journal of the International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilisation (ISTAC), Special Issue, 185-206. doi: 10.31436/shajarah.v0i0.902.
  2. Al-Daihani, M., Dirie, K., & Alam, M. (2024). An Islamic crowdfunding model for the agricultural sector: A proposal based on salam and muzāra’ah-waqf scheme. ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance, 16(1), 4-23. doi: 10.55188/ijif.v16iS1.566.
  3. Arla Foods Ingredients invests US$35M in carbon reduction project. (2024). Retrieved from https:// dairybusinessmea.com/2024/03/08/arla-foods-ingredients-invests-us35m-in-carbon-reduction-project/.
  4. Aryal, J.P., Sapkota, T.B., Rahut, D.B., & Jat, M.L. (2020). Agricultural sustainability under emerging climatic variability: The role of climate-smart agriculture and relevant policies in India. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 14(2), 219-245. doi: 10.1504/IJISD.2020.106243.
  5. BayWa sustainability initiatives: Agriculture & nutrition. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.baywa.com/en/ sustainability/value-creation/agriculture-nutrition.
  6. Bechko, P.K., Vlasiuk, S.A., Nepochatenko, O.A., & Nahorna, Y.I. (2022). Ways to improve tax incentives for the agricultural sector of the economy. Business Inform, 1, 331-339. doi: 10.32983/2222-4459-2022-1331-339.
  7. Bogonos, M., Chmil, A., Nazarkina, R., Nykolyuk, O., Pyvovar, P., & Stolnikovych, H. (2024). Agricultural outlook Ukraine 2024-2033: Report-summary. Kyiv: Kyiv School of Economics.
  8. Boltianska, N.I., Manita, I.Y., & Komar, A.S. (2021). Justification of the energy saving mechanism in the agricultural sector. Engineering of Nature Management, 1(19), 7-12. doi: 10.37700/enm.2021.1(19).7-12.
  9. Deng, H., Zheng, W., Shen, Z., & Štreimikienė, D. (2023). Does fiscal expenditure promote green agricultural productivity gains: An investigation on corn production. Applied Energy, 334, article number 120666. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.120666.
  10. Dias, C., Gouveia Rodrigues, R., & Ferreira, J.J. (2021). Small agricultural businesses’ performance – what is the role of dynamic capabilities, entrepreneurial orientation, and environmental sustainability commitment? Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(4), 1898-1912. doi: 10.1002/bse.2723.
  11. Donner, M., Verniquet, A., Broeze, J., Kayser, K., & De Vries, H. (2021). Critical success and risk factors for circular business models valorising agricultural waste and by-products. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 165, article number 105236. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105236.
  12. Du, Y., & Wang, W. (2023). The role of green financing, agriculture development, geopolitical risk, and natural resource on environmental pollution in China. Resources Policy, 82, article number 103440. doi: 10.1016/j. resourpol.2023.103440.
  13. Eurostat. (2024). Performance of the agricultural sector. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statisticsexplained/index.php/Performance_of_the_agricultural_sector.
  14. FAO & IFAD. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/fae448e6-8b664635-9a64-55b50d95a702/content.
  15. FAO. (2024). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved from https://www.fao.org/ statistics/en.
  16. Garske, B., Stubenrauch, J., & Ekardt, F. (2020). Sustainable phosphorus management in European agricultural and environmental law. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 29(1), 107-117. doi: 10.1111/reel.12318.
  17. Gomina, S.K., Gomina, O.E., Ojadi, J.O., Egbubine, L., Adisa, O.E., & Shola, T.E. (2024). Analyzing agricultural funding, poverty alleviation, and economic growth in Nigeria: A focus on the Abuja Federal Ministry of Agriculture. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 23(2), 720-734. doi: 10.30574/wjarr.2024.23.2.2406.
  18. Green budgeting. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/green-budgeting.html.
  19. GUS Poland. (2024). Preliminary estimate of the main agricultural and horticultural crops in 2024. Retrieved from https://stat.gov.pl/en/topics/agriculture-forestry/agricultural-and-horticultural-crops/preliminary-estimateof-the-main-agricultural-and-horticultural-crops-in-2024,8,1.html.
  20. Haque, F., Fan, C., & Lee, Y.Y. (2023). From waste to value: Addressing the relevance of waste recovery to agricultural sector in line with circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 415, article number 137873. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137873.
  21. IMF climate finance strategy paper. (2020). Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/en/Topics/climate-change/ green-finance.
  22. Jhariya, M.K., Meena, R.S., Banerjee, A., & Meena, S.N. (Eds.). (2021). Natural resources conservation and advances for sustainability. San Diego: Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/C2019-0-03763-6.
  23. Kernel becomes the first in Ukraine to launch financing via a commodity agrarian note. (2025). Retrieved from https://surl.li/cgrlrk.
  24. Liu, S., & Wang, Y. (2023). Green innovation effect of pilot zones for green finance reform: Evidence of quasi natural experiment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 186, article number 122079. doi: 10.1016/j. techfore.2022.122079.
  25. Liubkina, O., Murovana, T., Magomedova, A., Siskos, E., & Akimova, L. (2019). Financial instruments of stimulating innovative activities of enterprises and its improvements. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 4, 336352. doi: 10.21272/mmi.2019.4-26.
  26. Mejia-Escobar, J.C., González-Ruiz, J.D., & Duque-Grisales, E. (2020). Sustainable financial products in the Latin America banking industry: Current status and insights. Sustainability, 12(14), article number 5648. doi: 10.3390/ su12145648.
  27. Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare. (2024). Agricultural statistics at a glance 2023. Retrieved from https:// desagri.gov.in/document-report/agricultural-statistics-at-a-glance-2023/.
  28. Mizik, T. (2021). Climate-smart agriculture on small-scale farms: A systematic literature review. Agronomy, 11(6), article number 1096. doi: 10.3390/agronomy11061096.
  29. Mykhailov, A.M., Mykhailova, L., Kharchenko, T., Mohylna, L., & Shestakova, A. (2021). Investment instruments for managing innovative transformations of the agricultural sector to ensure sustainable development in the context of globalization. Studies of Applied Economics, 39(7). doi: 10.25115/eea.v39i7.5068.
  30. National Bureau of Statistics of China. (2024). Bulletin on the national grain production in 2024. Retrieved from https://www.stats.gov.cn/english/PressRelease/202412/t20241219_1957784.html.
  31. OECD-FAO. (2024). OECD-FAO Agricultural outlook 2024-2033. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/en/ publications/oecd-fao-agricultural-outlook-2024-2033_4c5d2cfb-en.html.
  32. Qin, C., Tang, Z., Chen, J., & Chen, X. (2020). The impact of soil and water resource conservation on agricultural production-an analysis of the agricultural production performance in Zhejiang, China. Agricultural Water Management, 240, article number 106268. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106268.
  33. Sridhar, A., Balakrishnan, A., Jacob, M.M., Sillanpää, M., & Dayanandan, N. (2023). Global impact of COVID-19 on agriculture: Role of sustainable agriculture and digital farming. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(15), 42509-42525. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19358-w.
  34. State Statistics Service of Ukraine. (2024). Agriculture, forestry and fisheries. Retrieved from https://stat.gov.ua/ en/topics/agriculture-forestry-and-fisheries.
  35. Statistics Canada. (2024). Agriculture and food statistics. Retrieved from https://www.statcan.gc.ca/en/subjectsstart/agriculture_and_food.
  36. The UN-convened network of banks, insurers and investors accelerating sustainable development. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.unepfi.org/.
  37. USDA NASS. (2022). 2022 census of agriculture. Retrieved from https://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/ AgCensus/2022/index.php.
  38. Wang, M.L. (2023). Effects of the green finance policy on the green innovation efficiency of the manufacturing industry: A difference-in-difference model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 189, article number 122333. doi: 10.1016/j.techforaqe.2023.122333.
  39. We are building the future for ourselves and future generations. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.cedrob. com.pl/o-nas/zielony-lad.
  40. Wittwer, R.A., et al. (2021). Organic and conservation agriculture promote ecosystem multifunctionality. Science Advances, 7(34), article number eabg6995. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abg6995.
  41. Xia, X., & Ruan, J. (2020). Analyzing barriers for developing a sustainable circular economy in agriculture in China Using Grey-DEMATEL approach. Sustainability, 12(16), article number 6358. doi: 10.3390/su12166358.
  42. Yu, Z., & Rehman Khan, S.A. (2022). Evolutionary game analysis of green agricultural product supply chain financing system: COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 25(7), 11151135. doi: 10.1080/13675567.2021.1879752.