Article

Received 19.05.2025

Revised 25.08.2025

Accepted 30.09.2025

Retrieved from Vol. 29, No. 3, 2025

Pages 71 -81

Karatieieva, О. (2025). Application of comprehensive integrated indices of breeding boars in DanBred breeding programmes. Ukrainian Black Sea Region Agrarian Science, 29(3), 71-81. https://doi.org/10.56407/bs.agrarian/3.2025.71

Application of comprehensive integrated indices of breeding boars in DanBred breeding programmes

Оlena Karatieieva

Breeding programs for pigs involve a comprehensive assessment of productive and reproductive traits in purebred lines through the use of individual breeding indices, which allows for an effective increase in the genetic potential of both crossbred animals for industrial production and subsequent generations of breeding stock. This approach differs from traditional methods that are limited to evaluating individual traits and slow down genetic progress. The aim of the study was to determine the feasibility of using an individual integral evaluation of boars and to establish the influence of their age and individual breeding index on reproductive and productive qualities. The study involved 304 Duroc sows, which were inseminated with semen from four boars differing in age, belonging to either the breeding nucleus or the reproductive group, and their comprehensive breeding value index, calculated according to the DanBred system (at least 130 points for the “breeding nucleus” and 105 points for the “reproductive group”). It was found that the individual comprehensive index and age of the boars significantly affected the reproductive performance of the sows. The best results in reproductive indices (sow reproductive quality index – 84.8; viability – 99.1%; reproductive index – 34.8; litter uniformity – 0.90) were obtained from sows inseminated with semen from young boars (12-18 months) with high indices. Older boars or those with lower breeding value indices showed poorer results. It was also established that young boars with high indices demonstrated better semen quality (ejaculate volume – 332.6 ml; concentration – 499.2 million/ml; motility – 8.7 points), although older boars produced more insemination doses per ejaculate (32.8). These findings confirm the feasibility of implementing boar index evaluation technology to improve the efficiency of breeding programs in Ukrainian pig production

breeding programs; reproductive qualities; pig farming; cluster evaluation; semen quality
  1. Althouse, G.C. (2024). Contaminant toxicity of concern for boars and semen used in assisted reproduction programs. Animal Reproduction Science, 269, article number 107519. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2024.107519.
  2. Ausejo-Marcos, R., et al. (2024). Spermiogram, kinetics, flow cytometric characteristics and DNA damage degree in boar ejaculates: Summarization and clustering. Veterinary Sciences, 11(9), article number 420. doi: 10.3390/ vetsci11090420.
  3. Balogun, K.B., & Stewart, K.R. (2021). Effects of air exposure and agitation on quality of stored boar semen samples. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 56(9), 1200-1208. doi: 10.1111/rda.13975.
  4. Council Directive 98/58/EC “Concerning the Protection of Animals Kept for Farming Purposes”. (1998, July). Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/1998/58/oj.
  5. DanBred. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://dbcorpstaging.wpengine.com/our-dna/.
  6. González-Diéguez, D., Tusell, L., Bouquet, A., Legarra, A., & Vitezica, Z.G. (2020). Purebred and crossbred genomic evaluation and mate allocation strategies to exploit dominance in pig crossbreeding schemes. G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics, 10(8), 2829-2841. doi: 10.1534/g3.120.401376.
  7. Gu, J., Zhang, Z., Xu, Y., Qadri, Q.R., Zhang, Z., Wang, Z., Wang, Q., & Pan, Y. (2023). Molecular design-based breeding: A kinship index-based selection method for complex traits in small livestock populations. Genes, 14(4), article number 807. doi: 10.3390/genes14040807.
  8. Harmatiuk, K.V. (2022). Methods for increasing pig productivity in modern conditions in southern Ukraine. (PhD dissertation, Odesa State Agrarian University, Odesa, Ukraine).
  9. Howard, J. (2019). The use of Big Data in a modern swine breeding program now and in the future. Retrieved from https://blog.steakgenomics.org/2019/06/bif-2019-use-of-big-data-in-modern.html.
  10. Jang, S., Ros-Freixedes, R., Hickey, J.M., Chen, C.Y., Herring, W. O., Misztal, I., & Lourenco, D. (2022). Using largescale whole-genome sequence data for single-step genomic predictions in maternal and terminal pig lines. bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2022.11.11.516229.
  11. Karpovsky, V., Usenko, S., & Shostya, A. (2020). Influence of prooxidant-antioxidant homeostasis on the functional activity of boars’ sperm with corrections of mineral nutrition. Scientific Reports of the National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, 16(6). doi: 10.31548/dopovidi2020.06.015.
  12. Khalak, V.I., & Gutyj, B.V. (2023). Productive qualities of young pigs of the Large White breed of diverse genealogical lines and interbreed differentiation according to some integrated indicators. The Animal Biology, 25(1), 27-31. doi: 10.15407/animbiol25.01.027.
  13. Khalak, V.I., Gutyj, B.V., & Bordun, O.M. (2024). Some innovations in pig farming and their zootechnical assessment. Ukrainian Journal of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, 7(2), 50-54. doi: 10.32718/ ujvas7-2.07.
  14. Kramarenko, A., Luhovyi, S., Karatieieva, O., & Kramarenko, S. (2023). Risk factors associated with stillbirth of piglets in Ukrainian Meat breed sows. Scientific Horizons, 26(10), 19-31. doi: 10.48077/scihor10.2023.19.
  15. Kramarenko, S., Lugovoy, S., Lykhach, A., Kramarenko, A., Lykhach, V., & Slobodianyk, A. (2019). Effect of genetic and non-genetic factors on the reproduction traits in Ukrainian Meat sows. Scientific Messenger of LNU of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies. Series: Agricultural Sciences, 21(90), 3-8. doi: 10.32718/nvlvet-a9001.
  16. Lykhach, A., Lykhach, V., Barkar, Y., Shpetny, M., & Kucher, O. (2023). Dependence between behavioural acts and sperm parameters of boars of modern and local breeds of Ukraine. Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology, 11(1), article number ee2023008 doi: 10.31893/JABB.23008.
  17. Melnyk, V., Karatieieva, H., Kravchenko, H., & Kogut, E. (2022). Hematological and biochemical blood indicators of young gilts after estrus synchronization. Scientific Papers. Series D. Animal science. LXV(1), 289-294.
  18. Nalon, E., & Stevenson, P. (2019). Protection of dairy cattle in the EU: State of play and directions for policymaking from a legal and animal advocacy perspective. Animals, 9(12), article number 1066. doi: 10.3390/ani9121066.
  19. Reyer, H., Abou-Soliman, I., Schulze, M., Henne, H., Reinsch, N., Schoen, J., & Wimmers, K. (2024). Genome-wide association analysis of semen characteristics in Piétrain boars. Genes, 15(3), article number 382. doi: 10.3390/ genes15030382.
  20. Salgado, H.H., Méthot, S., Remus, A., Létourneau-Montminy, M.P., & Pomar, C. (2021). A novel feeding behavior index integrating several components of the feeding behavior of finishing pigs. Animal, 15(7), article number 100251. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2021.100251.
  21. Sheremeta, V.I., & Opanasenko, O.S. (2012). Assessment of the reproductive capacity of breeding boars based on the ejaculation index. Taurida Scientific Herald, 78(2), 134-138.
  22. Stavetska, R.V., & Piotrovych, N.A. (2015). Influence of genotype of buds on reproductive quality of sows. Animal Husbandry Products Production and Processing, 1, 65-70.
  23. Tsheten, G., & Penjor, T. (2024). Determinants of repeat breeding in sows and gilts at the National piggery development centre in Bhutan: A retrospective study. Bhutan Journal of Animal Science, 8(1), 90-102.
  24. Turner, S.P., Camerlink, I., Baxter, E.M., D’Eath, R.B., Desire, S., & Roehe, R. (2024). Breeding for pig welfare: Opportunities and challenges. In Advances in pig welfare (pp. 429-447). Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-323-85676-8.00003-1.
  25. Vaishnav, S., Saini, T., Ahmad, S.F., Gaur, G.K., Mehrotra, A., & Chauhan, A. (2025). Breeding management in commercial pig farms. In Commercial pig farming (pp. 29-46). London: Academic Press. doi: 10.1016/B978-0443-23769-0.00003-8.
  26. von Keyserlingk, M.A., Hendricks, J., Ventura, B., & Weary, D.M. (2024). Swine industry perspectives on the future of pig farming. Animal Welfare, 33, article number e7. doi: 10.1017/awf.2024.2.
  27. Ye, S., Song, H., Ding, X., Zhang, Z., & Li, J. (2020). Pre-selecting markers based on fixation index scores improved the power of genomic evaluations in a combined Yorkshire pig population. Animal, 14(8), 1555-1564. doi: 10.1017/s1751731120000506.