Article

Received 16.01.2025

Revised 06.05.2025

Accepted 24.06.2025

Retrieved from Volume 29, No. 2, 2025

Pages 85 -93

Skoryk, V. (2025). Response of maize hybrids to irrigation methods and primary tillage in the Ukrainian Steppe. Ukrainian Black Sea Region Agrarian Science, 29(2), 85-93. https://doi.org/10.56407/bs.agrarian/2.2025.85

Response of maize hybrids to irrigation methods and primary tillage in the Ukrainian Steppe

Volodymyr Skoryk

The aim of the study was to determine the response of maize hybrids to drip irrigation compared to traditional sprinkler irrigation under conventional plowing (30-32 cm) and deep tillage (35-37 cm) as the primary soil cultivation methods. The article presents the results of evaluating the effectiveness of drip irrigation and sprinkler irrigation, as well as the impact of deep non-inversion tillage versus classical plowing on maize yield across different FAO maturity groups in the Ukrainian Steppe. The research was conducted in an irrigated crop rotation on southern solonetsic chernozem soils with a humus content of 2.9-3.2% and a pH of 6.2. The preceding crop was sunflower. The total water application rate during the growing season was 4,000 m³/ha. The study included 11 hybrids with FAO numbers ranging from 210 to 370. A low yield variation (CV = 12.7-13.4%) indicates a uniform response of the studied hybrids to changes in growing conditions. Maize yield significantly increased under drip irrigation by +0.75 to +2.13 t/ha (+7.5 to +18.3%). Deep tillage provided a notable yield increase of +0.46 t/ha under sprinkler irrigation and +0.70 t/ha under drip irrigation. The hybrids VN 63 (FAO 280) showed a strong positive response to deep tillage (+1.0 to +1.35 t/ha), as did Gran 6 (FAO 300) with +0.87 to +1.23 t/ha, Tesla (FAO 350) with +0.66 to +0.99 t/ha, and Gran 1 (FAO 370) with +0.89 to +1.12 t/ha under both irrigation methods. The study established that hybrids with FAO less than 280 are not suitable for cultivation in the Southern Steppe due to lower grain yield. Among the FAO 200-300 group, VN 63 and Gran 6 achieved significant yield increases of +0.5 to +2.5 t/ha, with yields of 10.93 and 11.99 t/ha, respectively. In the FAO 320-400 group, Tesla and Gran 1 demonstrated substantial yield gains of +0.61 to +2.08 t/ha, with average yields of 14.06 and 13.92 t/ha, respectively. The highest grain yields of 15.57 and 15.49 t/ha were achieved by the Tesla (FAO 350) and Gran 1 (FAO 370) hybrids under deep tillage combined with drip irrigation, significantly (>CI0.99) outperforming the standard. The analysis indicates the high effectiveness of drip irrigation and deep tillage in enhancing maize yields in the Southern Ukrainian Steppe

yield; drip irrigation; sprinkler irrigation; plowing; soil loosening
  1. A new world record for corn yield has been achieved – 39.2 t/ha. (2024). Retrieved from https://salo.li/096B606.
  2. Averchev, O.V., Ivanov, M.O., & Lavrynenko, Iu.O. (2020). Variability of elements of productivity structure in corn hybrids of different FAO groups and their connection with grain yields in different methods of irrigation and moisture in the arid steppe of Ukraine. Taurida Scientific Herald. Series: Rural Sciences, 112, 3-15. doi: 10.32851/2226-0099.2020.112.1.
  3. Corn on drip irrigation: Why it is effective. (2022). Retrieved from https://agronomy.com.ua/statti/1130kukurudza-na-kraplynnomu-zroshenni-chomu-tse-efektyvno.%20html.
  4. Dolya, S.M. (2019). Efficiency of tillage methods during the corn growing in the Left-Bank Forest-Steppe of Ukraine. (Doctoral dissertation, State Biotechnological University, Kharkiv, Ukraine).
  5. Galchenko, N.M., Reznichenko, N.D., Roy, S.S., & Manuilenko, O.V. (2022). Influence of watering methods on productivity of maize hybrids. Agrarian Innovation, 12, 5-9. doi: 0.32848/agrar.innov.2022.12.1.
  6. Gusarova, A. (2023). The record yield of corn 39.14 tons/ha in the season-2023 received a farmer from Virginia (USA). Retrieved from https://salo.li/eeB5E7C.
  7. Irrigation of corn crops becomes an urgent necessity. (2021). Retrieved from https://agro-business.com.ua/ agro/ahronomiia-sohodni/item/22021-zroshennia-posiviv-kukurudzy-staie-hostroiu-neobkhidnistiu.html.
  8. Ivaniv, M.O., & Repilevsky, D.E. (2021). Yield structure of maize hybrids of different FAO groups depending on irrigation methods under the conditions of the Southern Steppe of Ukraine. Taurida Scientific Herald. Series: Rural Sciences, 119, 99-111. doi: 10.32851/2226-0099.2021.119.14.
  9. Kernasiuk, Y. (2021). Corn in the world. Retrieved from https://agro-business.com.ua/agro/ekonomichnyihektar/item/21184-kukurudza-u-sviti.html.
  10. Krutyakova, V.I., Pilyak, N.V., & Nikipelova, O.M. (2021). Economic efficiency of growing grain corn using new biofertilisers based on sewage sludge. Agroecological Journal, 2, 58-61. doi:10.33730/20774893.2.2021.234458.
  11. Marchenko, T., Skakun, V., Lavrynenko, Yu., Zavalnyuk, О., & Skakun, Ye. (2023). Biometric parameters and yield of maize hybrids in dependence on agricultural technology elements. Scientific Horizons, 26(11), 90-99. doi: 10.48077/scihor11.2023.90.
  12. Marchenko, T.Yu., Lavrynenko, Yu.O., & Zabara, P.P. (2020). Models of corn hybrids of different maturity groups FAO 150-490 for irrigated conditions. Agrarian Іnnovations, 1, 103-109. doi: 10.32848/agrar.innov.2020.2.18.
  13. Marenych, M.M., & Koba, K.V. (2024). The impact of tillage on the yield of maternal lines of maize hybrids. Scientific Progress & Innovations, 1, 19-23. doi:10.31210/spi2024.27.01.03.
  14. Meteopost. (2025). Retrieved from https://meteopost.com/weather/archive/.
  15. Pashchenko, Yu.M. (2009). Adaptive and resource-saving technologies of cultivation of corn hybrids. Dnipro: Art-Press.
  16. Polishchuk, M.I., & Khavhun, A.A. (2023). Ways to increase the yield of corn hybrids in conditions of climate warming. Podilian Bulletin: Agriculture, Technology, Economics, 2(39), 54-59. doi: 10.37406/2706-9052-2023-2.8.
  17. Shatkovskyi, A.P., Melnychuk, F.S., Retman, M.S., Gulenko, O.I., & Kalilei, V.V. (2021). Water consumption and productivity of agricultural crops under subsurface drip irrigation. Taurida Scientific Herald. Series: Rural Sciences, 120, 299-305. doi: 10.32851/2226-0099.2021.120.37.
  18. Shatkovskyi, A.P., Zhuravlev, O.V., Melnychuk, F.S., Ovchatov, I.M., & Yarosh, A.V. (2020). Influence of irrigation methods on corn’s productivity. Plant and Soil Science, 11(4), 34-42. doi: 10.31548/agr2020.04.034.
  19. State Statistic Service of Ukraine. (2022). Area, gross harvest and yield of crops by type and by region. Retrieved from https://ukrstat.gov.ua/operativ/operativ2022/sg/pvzu/arch_pvxu_reg.htm.
  20. Tkachenko, M., & Borys, N. (2018). Influence of hydrothermal climate changes and the method of basic treatment on corn performance on grain. Retrieved from https://propozitsiya.com/articles/tekhnolohiyi-vyroshchuvannya/ vplyv-hidrotermichnykh-zmin-klimatu-ta-sposobu-osnovnoho.
  21. Tomashuk, O.V. (2019). Economic efficiency of cultivation of corn hybrids for grain with different soil cultivation technologies. Feed and Feed Production, 87, 144-150.
  22. Ushkarenko, V.O., Vozhegova, R.A., Goloborodko, S.P., & Kokovikhin, S.V. (2013). Statistical analysis of field trial results in agriculture. Kherson: Ilant.
  23. Vozhegova, R.A., Malyarchuk, A.S., Reznichenko, N.D., & Kotelnikov, D.I. (2022). Effect of different basic tillage and fertiliser systems on corn grain yield, when irrigating in the south of Ukraine. Land Reclamation and Water Management, 1, 128-135. doi: 10.31073/mivg202101-285.
  24. Yeshchenko, V.A., Kopitko, P.G., Kostogriz, P.V., & Opryshko, V.P. (2014). Fundamentals of scientific research in agronomy. Vinnytsia: TD Edelweiss and K.