• Home
  • Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
      Editorial Board
      Indexing
      Sources of Financing
      Ethics & Policies
      Publication Ethics Conflict of Interest Open Access Policy Archiving Complaints Policy Privacy Statement Corrections and Retractions Academic Integrity Generative AI Policy
      For Authors
      Terms of Publication Formatting Guidelines Peer Review Process Article Processing Charges License Agreement
  • Submission
  • Contacts
en
  • Українська

Ukrainian Black Sea Region Agrarian Science

  • Submit an article
  • Home
  • Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Open Access Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Academic Integrity Generative AI Policy
  • Contacts

Article

  • Read article
  • Download article

Received 03.06.2025

Revised 05.09.2025

Accepted 30.09.2025

Retrieved from Vol. 29, No. 3, 2025

Pages 48 -58

  • 743 Views

Suggested citation

Caisîn, L., Chițanu, A., Grosu, N., Dubiț, D., & Modvală, S. (2025). The impact of climate change on the forage base in the Republic of Moldova. Ukrainian Black Sea Region Agrarian Science, 29(3), 48-58. https://doi.org/10.56407/bs.agrarian/3.2025.48

The impact of climate change on the forage base in the Republic of Moldova

Larisa Caisîn Ana Chițanu Natalia Grosu Daniela Dubiț Susana Modvală

Abstract

The study aimed to determine the optimal conditions for using biological products to improve the agroecological efficiency of grain crops, by analysing their impact on plant physiological processes, productivity and soil resources. The study presented the results of the study of the influence of biological products on the yield, product quality, dynamics of plant development phases and soil microflora composition when growing barley of the Helios variety and buckwheat of the Antaria variety in the South of Ukraine. The experiment was conducted using nitrogen-fixing, mycorrhizal and phosphate-mobilising biological products, both individually and in combination, with the establishment of control and experimental plots. The analysis included an assessment of yields, protein content in grain, changes in plant development stages and the activity of soil microorganisms. The results of the study demonstrated that the use of biological products provided a significant increase in yields: barley showed an increase of 20-25%, and buckwheat – by 18-22% compared to the control plots. The protein content of the grain also increased, reaching 12% for barley and 14% for buckwheat. The duration of plant development phases was reduced, which contributed to more efficient use of soil resources and optimisation of growth processes. Changes in the composition of soil microflora were particularly noticeable: the number of nitrogen-fixing bacteria increased by 40% and phosphate-mobilising – by 50%, which improved the availability of nutrients for plants. The highest results were achieved when using combinations of biological products that demonstrated a synergistic effect, increasing crop productivity and improving product quality. The results confirmed the effectiveness of biological products in creating sustainable agroecosystems, ensuring environmental safety, reducing the need for chemical fertilisers and increasing the economic profitability of agricultural production. The use of biological products is a promising area for optimising modern agricultural technologies in regions with unfavourable soil and climatic conditions

Keywords:

agrotechnology; yield; agroecosystems; environmental sustainability; organic nutrition

References

  1. Agriculture and horticulture. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.climatechangepost.com/countries/moldova/ agriculture-and-horticulture/.
  2. Ahmad, W., Bibi, N., Sanwal, M., Ahmed, R., Jamil, M., Kalsoom, R., Arif, M., & Fahad, S. (2024). Cereal crops in the era of climate change: An overview. In Environment, climate, plant and vegetation growth (pp. 609-630). Cham: Springer Nature. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-69417-2_21.
  3. Climate Change Knowledge Portal. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://climateknowledgeportal.worldbank.org/.
  4. Dubeux, J.C.B., Jaramillo, D.M., Santos, E.R.S., Garcia, L., Queiroz, L.M.D., Bretas, I.L., de Souza, C.H.L., & Trumpp, K.R. (2024). Sustainable intensification of livestock systems using forage legumes in the Anthropocene. Grass and Forage Science, 79(4), 481-498. doi: 10.1111/gfs.12696.
  5. Godde, C.M., Mason-D’Croz, D., Mayberry, D.E., Thornton, P.K., & Herrero, M. (2021). Impacts of climate change on the livestock food supply chain: A review of the evidence. Global Food Security, 28, article number 100488. doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100488.
  6. Hart, E.H., Christofides, S.R., Teri, E.D., Pauline, R.S., Christopher, J.C., Carsten, T.M., Hilary, J.R., & Kingston-Smith, A.H. (2022). Forage grass growth under future climate change scenarios affects fermentation and ruminant efficiency. Scientific Reports, 12, article number 4454. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08309-7.
  7. Iglesias, A., & Garrote, L. (2019). Adaptation strategies for agricultural water management under climate variability in Eastern Europe. Agricultural Water Management, 155, 113-124. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2015.03.014.
  8. IPCC Sixth assessment report: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. (2023). Retrieved from https://www.ipcc. ch/report/ar6/wg2/.
  9. Koubi, V., Freihardt, J., & Rudolph, L. (2022). Environmental change and migration aspirations: Evidence from Bangladesh. SocArXiv. doi: 10.31235/osf.io/h5q9y.
  10. Kumar, L., Chhogyel, N., Gopalakrishnan, T., Hasan, M.K., Jayasin, S.L., Kariyawasam, C.S., Kogo, B.K., & Ratnayake, S. (2022). Climate change and future of agri-food production. In Future Foods (pp. 49-79). New York: Academic Press. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-323-91001-9.00009-8.
  11. Law No. 438 of Republic of Moldova “Regional development in the Republic of Moldova”. (2006, December). Retrieved from https://www.legis.md/cautare/getResults?doc_id=130212&lang=ro.
  12. MacLeod, M., Henderson, B., Teillard, F., Kinyanjui, W., Tadesse, F., Cando, L., Halpern, C., Germer, L.A., & Gerber, P.J. (2023). Investigating the dynamics of resilience and greenhouse gas performance of pastoral cattle systems in southern Ethiopia. Agricultural Systems, 207, article number 103636. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103636.
  13. Mahadevan, M., Noel, J.K., Umesh, M., Santhosh, A.S., & Suresh, S. (2024). Climate change impact on water resources, food production and agricultural practices. In The Climate-Health-Sustainability Nexus (pp. 207-229). Cham: Springer Nature. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-56564-9_9.
  14. Maher, A.T., Prendeville, H.R., Halofsky, J.E., Rowland, M.M., Davies, K.W., & Boyd, C.S. (2024). Climate change vulnerabilities and adaptation strategies for land managers on northwest US rangelands. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 98, 399-413. doi: 10.1016/j.rama.2024.04.012.
  15. Murabildayeva, R., Bimendiyeva, L., Kondybayeva, S., & Yermekova, Zh. (2024). Climate change and agricultural productivity: Economic implications for food security. Scientific Horizons, 27(12), 168-179. doi: 10.48077/ scihor12.2024.168.
  16. National Bureau of Statistics of the Republic of Moldova. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://statbank.statistica.md/ PxWeb/pxweb/ro/.
  17. NOAA National Centres for Environmental Information. (2023). Retrieved from https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/ access/monitoring/monthly-report/global/202313.
  18. Orosz, S., & Balogh, K. (2023). Corn silage 2012-2022 (dry continental region of Europe). In Proceedings of the 19th international symposium forage conservation (pp. 100-101). Brno: Mendel University in Brno.
  19. Prăvălie, R., et al. (2024). A unifying modelling of multiple land degradation pathways in Europe. Nature Communication, 15, article number 3862. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-48252-x.
  20. Ringler, C., Agbonlahor, M., Barron, J., Baye, K., Meenakshi, J.V., Mekonnen, D.K., & Uhlenbrook, S. (2022). The role of water in transforming food systems. Global Food Security, 33, article number 100639. doi: 10.1016/j. gfs.2022.100639.
  21. Ruban, S., Danshyn, V., Pryima, S., & Sorak, D. (2024). Meat cattle breeding in Ukraine (climate impact, breeding features, efficiency improvement strategies). Animal Science and Food Technology, 15(3), 72-86. doi: 10.31548/animal.3.2024.72.
  22. Sollenberger, L.E., & Kohmann, M.M. (2024). Forage legume responses to climate change factors. Crop Science, 64(5), 2419-2432. doi: 10.1002/csc2.21304.
  23. Tothi, R., Orosz, S., Somfalvi-Tóth, K., Babinszky, L., & Halas, V. (2024). Effect of climate change on strategy of forage feeding in cattle farms under dry continental conditions. In Latest scientific findings in ruminant nutrition – research for practical implementation. London: IntechOpen. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.1005884.
  24. Tulu, D., Gadissa, S., Hundessa, F., & Kebede, E. (2023). Contribution of climate-smart forage and fodder production for sustainable livestock production and environment: Lessons and challenges from Ethiopia. Advances in Agriculture, 11, article number 8067776. doi: 10.1155/2023/8067776.
  25. Wang, J., Kranthi, V.S., Saxena, R., Orsat, V., & Vijaya, R. (2018). Effect of climate change on the yield of cereal crops. Climate, 6(2), article number 42. doi: 10.3390/cli6020041.
  26. Yuan, X., Li, S., Chen, J., Yu, H., Yang, T., Wang, C., Huang, S., Chen, H., & Ao, X. (2024). Impacts of global climate change on agricultural production: A comprehensive review. Agronomy, 14(7), article number 1360. doi: 10.3390/agronomy14071360.
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email
Telegram
Viber
WhatsApp

Address
54020, Ukraine, Mykolaiv,
9 Georgiy Gongadze Str.


Email
ubsras@bsagriculture.com.ua

Main information
  • Aims and Scope
  • Indexing
  • Terms of Publication
  • Editorial Board
  • Publication Ethics
Additional information
  • Complaints Policy
  • Peer Review Process
  • Open Access Policy
  • Academic Integrity Generative AI Policy
  • Archiving